Pastor: The Theology and Practice of Ordained Ministry by William H. Willimon

This book, on many levels, is designed to be academically rigorous.  In its 336 pages, it has 474 citations.  These citations range from early Church fathers to Medieval monks to modern theologians like Hauerwas, Brueggemann, and Dawn.  Not only were the notes extensive, they covered a great deal of diversity.  Judging from the citations, this book is heavily influenced by Karl Barth, Richard Baxter, Walter Brueggemann, Stanley Hauerwas, John Wesley, and Martin Luther.  Willimon represents his Methodist heritage, but also seems to have some Reformed leanings.

To begin, Willimon notes four things about pastoral ministry: ministry is an act of God; ministry is an act of the church; to be a pastor is to be tied in a unique way to the church, the believing community in Christ; and ministry is difficult.  This then leads to the significance of ordained ministry.  Willimon wants to affirm several things about ordination: it is an act of Christ and his church; it is for service to Christ and the church; it arises ‘from above,’ as a gracious gift of the Holy Spirit; it arises from below, from the church’s need for, and wisdom in designating, leadership; it forms those who are to serve as priests to the priests; it sets apart those who are to serve as exemplars to the congregation, being in all things without fault; it is an act of collegiality; and it is effected through the laying on of hands and prayer.  Ordained ministry is to be called to be “servant to the servants of God.”

There are several contemporary images that have drastically shaped the concept of pastor, for better or worse.  These include: political negotiator, therapist, manager, resident activist, preacher, and servant.  Several of these images have created expectations of the pastorate that are not Biblical.  Therapist and manager are two that fall largely into that category.  The recovery of preacher and servant have been one positive movement toward a more Biblical approach to ministry.  In all things, Willimon reminds us that ministry is to be cruciform.

Priestly patterns of ministry have several elements: gathering the congregation; gathering them around the story of God; interpreting, proclaiming, and expounding Scripture; preparing the congregation for service; calling for and receiving the offering; remembering God’s mighty acts; eating meals together in Jesus’ name; and scattering the church into the world.  “In all acts of ministry the pastor is priest, the one who constantly looks for ways in which all of our meetings with one another might also be meeting with the living Christ, in which every activity of the church might be sacramental, a means of grace, a human act whereby we sign, signal, and point to the outbreak of the kingdom of God among us” (90).

The pastor as interpreter of Scripture and preacher and teacher are especially important.  Words make worlds.  The question is not whether we are shaped by outside influences but which outside influences we will allow to shape us.  Given that we are increasingly in a post-Christian culture, those images for pastoral ministry are vital.  Pastors are called to equip the saints for every good work and help the Church live out the counter-narrative that typically opposes our culture.

Pastoral counseling is vastly different than clinical counseling.  According to Willimon pastoral counseling does not so much depend on the contemporary counseling methods that seek to be “unbiased” (as if that were a possibility).  Rather, pastoral counseling is about guiding people and that quite often means speaking the truth in love at the point of people’s deepest points of brokenness.

Consistently, Willimon places emphasis on the pastor’s character.  Preaching includes more than words; it is living.  Although the pastor is a Christian among Christians, they must also be leaders to the flock as an example of this odd kingdom ethic – the Church.  Constancy in ministry is one way that this is accomplished.  Living among people for an extended period of time allows others to observe our way of life and for us to make the deepest impact on the community.  This also means that we must take care of ourselves (not selfishly).  But, we must maintain our relationship with God and take care of our spiritual, physical, and mental well-being.  This includes discerning what is “essential” and what is merely “important” in ministry.

Overall, I thought this book was fantastic.  Willimon has an uncanny ability to communicate clearly and pointedly with a great understanding of the contemporary atmosphere that the Church faces.  I like Willimon’s approach to pastoral ministry.  He communicates well the tensions that the pastor finds and must be able to work through as a minister to the flock.

“Productive” Pastors

Genesis 1 is the great Creation narrative.  God subdues and orders chaos with only a word.  Space is created where life can be sustained and blessed by its Creator.  For six days God creates “space” and fills it with every living creature.  On the sixth day, humanity is created, crowning the Creation of God’s delight.  On the seventh day God rests and separates that day by making it holy.

There is much that can be said concerning those first six days of Creation.  Yet, the first thing that humanity sees God “doing” is not creating but resting.  If we are truly created in the imago Dei, image of God, this might be an important thing to note.  God definitely creates us to be laborers within the creation (tilling the soil).  Yet, God does not define God’s self by the accomplishment of tasks.

Our world is one that typically values people in terms of production.  How useful we are to another’s agenda or how we benefit the “bottom line” is employed to determine our “worth.”  This business-model mentality has seeped into the Church.  Pastors are expected to make their churches “grow.”  Success is determined by how many people were “saved” or “sanctified.”  Sometimes it can almost feel like the pastor is being paraded around like a show dog in front of the judges.  It’s a lot of expectations to fill.

The culture is not entirely at fault.  Pastors quite often want to see numerical and spiritual growth.  Those are necessarily bad things.  But, we can become very easily depressed if the church does not measure up to our expectations or if it falls far short of our hopes.  We hang our heads; we mope and worry.  If we have placed our “worth” and “value” in terms of the business-model’s idea of success, we will often be severely disappointed.

Is God’s assessment of us the same as the business-model?  Are we only of use to God in terms of our productivity?  Is God’s favor derivative of our work?  Refer back to the first account of Creation.  God creates humanity on the sixth day.  Even before we have managed to do one productive thing, God blesses us along with all of Creation.  We can’t discount that God calls us to labor in the Garden, but we were created for so much more than cheap labor.  After all, God creates everything in only a word… there does not seem to be a pressing need for our productivity to get things accomplished.

The seventh day is the Sabbath, set apart and made holy.  The invitation to rest is given to humanity even before it has been “productive.”  This day of rest points humanity towards what is God’s deepest desire: relationship.  God is not a cruel and harsh task-master, ready to make sure we meet our quota.  Does God invite our participation in caring for Creation?  Yes.  We are called to govern over it, but even this is done in relation to God!  Yet, our “value” is found in our connection with God alone!

Pastors are stilled called today to “till the soil” and prepare the seed in the lives of people to whom we minister.  It is a wonderful, joyous calling.  However, our primary goal is not the accomplishment of tasks, productivity for bottom lines, or business-model value systems of evaluating ourselves and others.  Rather, we have the wonderful opportunity to “rest” in the presence of God and invite others to do the same.  In a world that pushes all of us to find our value in what we do rather than who we are, pastors have an important and challenging task.  We must be careful not to get wrapped up in a system that causes us to place our worth in terms of our “success.”  And, we must hold up this same vision for our congregation.  Find your value in whose you are as God’s child and “good” creation!

Sabbath and the Contemplative Pastor

I really enjoyed reading this book.  More than that though, it was challening reading Peterson’s understanding of pastoral ministry.  I found myself wrestling with the tensions that he describes.  How do we fulfill our vocational calling while treating those we minister to with Gospel dignity.  That is a difficult tightrope to walk at times.

I especially like the distinction that Peterson makes in outlining pastoral vocation as unbusy, subversive, and apocalyptic.  Unbusy indicates that pastors are not bogged down by “running” a church.  Although administration is part and parcel of our “job” as pastors, that is not what we are called to “be.”  Being unbusy means that we are unrushed.  It is not a “works-based” righteousness.  It is important that we embody that in our ministry.

It is about being saturated in prayer and Scripture.  The Spirit, not the calendar, directs our lives.  We are not called to be important (we usually show our importance by how much stuff we do).  It is a vanity that says the Church cannot survive without my effort.  Being unbusy is a resting in God’s work in the Church and that we are called to “be” not “do.”

Furthermore, we are called to be subversive.  We oppose the culture and what it deems we are to be as pastors and as people.  It means that the kingdom of self is replaced by the Kingdom of God in our lives and in the lives of our congregations.  It is looking for the Kingdom that is even now burgeoning in our lives.  And, it is allowing our wills to be subsumed by that Kingdom so that we are partners with God’s re-creational work in the world.

Finally, pastors are apocalyptic.  This is not end-of-the-world proclamations aimed at our people.  Rather, the apocalyptic pastor is one who prays, perseveres, and uses language poetically (as a “maker”).  We are truth tellers that are shaped by the Word and employ words to shape the world.  It is a confidence that God’s work in the world is already happening and will come to fruition and completion in the fullness of time.  Sabbath helps us “cease” so that we are fully present, able to listen, and focused upon what God is doing rather than on what we are doing to bring God’s Kingdom about.

For me, it has been a struggle to stop.  I don’t do it very well.  This has been especially true with finishing school, keeping up with ministry, and finishing wedding and honeymoon plans.  There’s so much to be accomplished and it seems there is so little time to accomplish it in.  Plus, I feel important when I have responsibilities that I am able to juggle.  It shows competence and skill.

But, too often it denigrates into building my kingdom rather than seeking to build God’s Kingdom.  It is an exercise in ego.  And, although I cannot neglect all of these activities and goals, it is important that I realize what is truly valuable and important in this life.  It is vital that I remember that I am valued because of who I am in Christ, not what I accomplish in life.  It doesn’t eliminate all of the tasks that must be finished, but it does prioritize them.  Sabbath is helping me remember this and re-evaluate my life in light of those facts.

Visioneering by Andy Stanley

Andy Stanley asserts that visioneering is the combination and culmination of inspiration, conviction, action, determination, and completion (8).  It provides a destination for our journey.  A compelling vision inevitably evokes passion, motivation, direction, and purpose for what we do in our daily lives (9-12).  And, lest we should think that this is a cleverly disguised business model to manipulate us into action, Stanley reminds us that a vision must be from God if it is to have eternal value and longevity.

The vision is birthed in the in-between places, between what is and what should be.  This is hardly mere fantasy, but it does involve an element of dreaming of what is possible.  These visions are usually conceived through the experiences we have of our broken world.  It “begins as a concern” (19).  For Nehemiah it was a concern for the way things were shaping up in Jerusalem versus the way things were supposed to be.  This concern precipitated Nehemiah’s action: waiting.

Typically, when we feel called to do something we rush out to begin.  As the old adage goes, “Failing to plan is planning to fail.”  Waiting and preparing is not inaction.  “Visioneering is a process” (20).  By patiently waiting we allow the vision to mature in us, we mature in the preparation for the vision, and we can realize and recognize the ways God is working to prepare the way for the vision (20-24).  Waiting and preparing is also a way to authenticate the vision.  Stanley believes that a “God-ordained vision will eventually feel like a moral imperative and it will be in line with what God is up to in the world” (25).

There are moments where the vision feels dead in the water.  There is no sense of movement to fulfill the vision.  It is in these moments where the vision typically dies.  How do we keep a vision energized: praying and planning.  The difference between a dreamer and a visionary is that a dreamer prays for things to be different and a visionary prays for opportunities to make a difference (32).  Prayer allows us to see those opportunities that are provided to us, as well as, ask for God to open up doors where they may be closed.  Planning may be the only other tangible thing we can do in those moments of inactivity.  What steps will we take and how can we go about achieving that?  A lack of preparation may mean that we are not able to utilize opportunities that present themselves.  That does not mean that the plans have to be set in stone, but it is important to have thought through the issues beforehand.

Another frustration in pursuing our vision might be the circumstances in which we find ourselves.  We may imagine that our situation is not conducive to pursuing and fulfilling the vision.  However, as illustrated with Nehemiah, God uses our circumstances to fulfill His vision for us.  We may confuse the rewards of success with success itself.  However, success is being faithful to the process, not merely receiving the rewards of success (which might not come).  “If I don’t consider myself successful until I see something happen, then I am only inches away from considering myself a failure (47).  It is very easy to fold our cards at this point to protect ourselves.  It is important to remember that God uses our circumstances, even when it seems impossible, to shape us into the people/ community we are called to be.

A God-ordained vision always overwhelms our talents and resources.  It is beyond our capabilities to accomplish.  Stanley reminds us that “a vision God originates is a vision God orchestrates” (56).  Becoming too focused on the “how” of a vision can leave us floundering about.  Rather, we must continue to be focused on the “who” or “what” of our vision.  God accomplishes the “how.”  We are simply called to be faithful and partner with God in the process.  It is likely that we will not entirely see the “how” of a vision until after it is completed.

The temptation with any vision is to feel a sense of independence when the rewards of success become tangible realities.  A God-vision requires us to be dependent upon God for guidance and for success.  Living into a vision is a matter of faith.  We trust God to make good on His promises and to fulfill the vision He has given us.  Faith is trusting Him to do that and walking head into that vision when it seems least likely to happen.  Too often we wrestle back control instead of relying upon God.  Our temptation is to become “self-sufficient” when we experience success.  The bigger the vision, the more we must rely upon God.

Our initial reaction to receiving a vision might be to rush out and tell everyone.  However, Stanley warns his audience to “walk before you talk; investigate before you initiate” (75).  Investigation of the circumstances facing you and the vision is important.  Understanding the circumstances can give you insight into what it will take which allows one to communicate with others logically about the situation and the vision.  Investigation also either “confirms the divine origin of your vision, gives it further definition and focus, or tips you off that you were mistaken about the vision altogether” (76).  Counting the cost allows us to be prepared and to further confirm and define the vision that God has given us.  By investigating we do not become subject to our emotions and prematurely rush into action.

In beginning to cast your vision to others it is vital to communicate the problem and the vision that is the solution to this problem.  The problem paints a picture of what is and opens the eyes of others to reality.  The solution paints a picture of what can be.  A compelling picture will move others to join in the vision by freeing their imagination to creatively explore what is possible.  A God-ordained vision captures the hearts of others, it takes a community.

Beyond communicating the problem and the solution, the vision-caster must also why this particular solution will work and why it must be done now.  In communicating these two elements it is important to connect the significance of the vision with what God is doing and what He desires to accomplish.  Building the walls back up after hundreds of years lying in ruins was not enough motivation for the Israelites.  But, discovering and understanding that God had something much larger in mind gave people the initiative to use their resources toward this end.  Every vision must be connected to God’s greater plan in order for the people to “arise and build.”

While we may have a vision that is personal, we will also have opportunities to cast vision for others under our care.  Words build worlds.  Our words can have a dramatic impact on a person’s trajectory.  As such, we must be careful in projecting what could be and what should be in someone’s life.  The apostle Paul warns us to use words to encourage others.  He would often call parishioners saints even though they could hardly be called that by their conduct.  As such, we cast a vision based on someone’s potential rather than their performance.

A vision never happens all by itself.  It needs people to join in the “good work.”  Bringing a vision to fruition takes a great deal of sacrifice.  A leader can never expect the people to risk and sacrifice more than she or he is willing to risk themselves.  One must lead by example in these moments.  If you are not willing to risk much for your vision, it is likely nobody else will risk much either.  It is at this point that you must be all in or get out.  Being faithful to God’s call, despite the overwhelming circumstances, is always a call to be all in.

Not everyone will buy into the vision.  There are going to be naysayers that criticize the vision, for whatever reason.  It is in these moments where we are called to pray and remember.  Pray for guidance in response to criticism and continually recall the ways that God has been faithful in the process of making the vision a reality.  And, it is important to remember that our plan and our vision may not always be the same thing.  It is easy to get discouraged and quit when our plan fails.  We may assume that the vision has failed as well.  However, there may be multiple ways to fulfill the vision.  Thomas Edison’s vision of a light bulb is a great example.  He failed numerous times, but each of those times he said he learned yet another way not to make a light bulb.  We must be careful to understand the difference between our plan and God’s vision.  “Visions are refined – they don’t change; plans are revised – they rarely stay the same” (158).

As you work with a group to fulfill the vision God has given you, there will naturally occur conflicts within the group.  Visions thrive in environments of unity and die in environments of division.  It is part of our responsibility of the leader who has the vision to keep people working together.  Conflict does not have to be a negative experience, if handled with care.  Rather, it can be an opportunity for growth.  Conflicts arise either over normal time or due to a “bump” in the road.  Whatever the cause, it is important to handle it immediately and with care.  Several indicators will become apparent in those that are the source of the conflict: “they will attempt to control rather than serve; they will manipulate people and circumstances to further their own agendas; they will exhibit an unwillingness to resolve their differences face-to-face; they exhibit an unwillingness to believe the best about other teammates; and they view team members’ failures as their own personal successes” (169).  To counter this conflict Stanley proposes that a leader must: “lead, don’t control; be a man or woman of integrity; resolve your differences face-to-face; and believe the best about other team members” (173-74).

Leadership and influence are not automatically extended to someone.  It comes to those that have “moral authority.”  Keeping to the vision at the expense of character will result in a loss of influence.  God will never ask us to compromise character as we live into His vision for our lives.  Establishing moral authority takes character, sacrifice and time.  If these three things are not upheld there will be a loss of that authority.  Although it may be re-gained if lost, moral authority will take more time and sacrifice to recapture.  Our walk must always match our talk.

Distractions to the vision usually come in the form of a good.  There are a number of good things that can be accomplished that may actually compromise the vision.  Distractions come in three forms: opportunities, criticism and fear.  Beyond good opportunities, criticism from others can distract us from the good work we are engaged in.  Anger toward our critics can distract us from the task at hand.  And, fear causes us to freeze because we are unsure about the unknowns of our situation.  Leaders must remain focused on the vision that God has given them.  Doing so helps us to prioritize what is most important in our lives and help keep us motivated to move forward through criticism and fear.

The vision is a means to an end.  Our vision is encompassed by God’s master plan: the salvation and redemption of the world.  We are called to participate in that larger vision.  We are called to be a light on a hill for the world to see.  In the pursuit of God’s vision there are three ways that Stanley proposes we embody God’s light: peace, healthy relationships, and character.  Each of these three elements is in short order in our world.  People lack peace, healthy relationships, and character.  When these are displayed in a person’s life, others take notice.  Christ is honored through our lives and it provides an opportunity to witness to those who are watching.  The vision often is the surface of the deeper thing that God is doing and desires to do in our lives and in the lives of others.

The end of a God-ordained vision is God.  Worship is the natural result when we see the wonderful ways that God has been faithful through the journey with us.  Nobody is unaffected by a God-ordained vision.  All recognize God’s hand upon it.  “Divine intervention, when it is recognized, results in authentic worship and unquestioned obedience.  Divine intervention, when it is remembered, can have the same results” (248).  God is glorified through the vision when we are faithful to God through the process.

Andy Stanley promotes the idea that “maintaining a vision requires adherence to a set of core beliefs and behaviors” (252).  In a study over “visionary corporations”, it was deduced that one of the characteristics of these corporations was their devotion to a set of core beliefs.  These beliefs provided boundaries that navigated the company in its choices.  When the initial emotions and excitement of maintaining a vision are high it is very easy to do the right thing.  When the going gets a bit rough, compromise may be an enticing option.  However, as discussed earlier, these sorts of compromise destroy the moral authority of a vision.  It is important that the vision’s integrity is protected by establishing a Biblical set of values that provide boundaries.

A vision requires constant attention.  People are quick to forget the vision and even quicker to chase other pursuits.  Keeping others on track requires bold leadership that must be anchored in the vision and carried out in conjunction with our core beliefs and values.

Don’t tolerate those things that have the potential to derail your vision.  Deal with them.  If you don’t, your tendency will be to begin distancing yourself from the problem people and the unaligned environments.  Things will only get worse.  After all, what is unmanaged generally becomes unmanageable… Visioneering calls for bold leadership.  Develop a healthy intolerance for those things that have the potential to impede your progress toward what could be and should be – those things God has put in your heart to do (267).

Visioneering is God’s call upon our life to participate in His redemptive program.  It calls others to join in the journey of living into this vision.  One must maintain her or his connection to God, for apart from God we can do nothing of eternal value.  Visioneering calls for faithful obedience, even at the expense of expediency, so that God may be glorified by all who see our good works.  And, it is in the redemption of others that we find ourselves being redeemed.

The Contemplative Pastor by Eugene Peterson

I really enjoyed reading this book.  More than that though, it was challening reading Peterson’s understanding of pastoral ministry.  I found myself wrestling with the tensions that he describes.  How do we fulfill our vocational calling while treating those we minister to with Gospel dignity.  That is a difficult tightrope to walk at times.

I especially like the distinction that Peterson makes in outling pastoral vocation as unbusy, subversive, and apocalyptic.  Unbusy indicates that pastors are not bogged down by “running” a church.  Although administration is part and parcel of our “job” as pastors, that is not what we are called to “be.”  Being unbusy means that we are unrushed.  It is not a “works-based” righteousness.  It is important that we embody that in our ministry.  It is about being saturated in prayer and Scripture.  The Spirit, not the calendar, directs our lives.

We are not called to be important (we usually show our importance by how much stuff we do).  It is a vanity that says the Church cannot survive without my effort.  Being unbusy is a resting in God’s work in the Church and that we are called to “be” not “do.”

Furthermore, we are called to be subversive.  We oppose the culture and what it deems we are to be as pastors and as people.  It means that the kingdom of self is replaced by the Kingdom of God in our lives and in the lives of our congregations.  It is looking for the Kingdom that is even now burgeoning in our lives.  And, it is allowing our wills to be subsumed by that Kingdom so that we are partners with God’s re-creational work in the world.

Finally, pastors are apocalyptic.  This is not end-of-the-world proclamations aimed at our people.  Rather, the apocalyptic pastor is one who prays, perseveres, and uses language poetically (as a “maker”).  We are truth tellers that are shaped by the Word and employ words to shape the world.  It is a confidence that God’s work in the world is already happening and will come to fruition and completion in the fullness of time.

Under the Unpredictable Plant by Eugene Peterson

Eugene Peterson’s primary message and intent in Under the Unpredictable Plant is to depict his concept of “vocational holiness.”  Peterson employs the story of Jonah to describe the temptations that are common in pastoral ministry.  These temptations, the desire of ambition, are designated as “Tarshish”, Jonah’s destination in running away from God’s call.  The current culture of religion has made the Church a marketplace of religiosity.  It is an extension of the consumer society.  As a result, pastors are often more concerned about climbing the ladder of corporate success than being stable ministers at a location for the long haul.  The culture emphasizes personal gain over the community; the Church only mimics the mantra of self-absorption.

Tarshish is the utopian ideal and false fantasy that Peterson denotes as Ecclesiastical Pornography.  Pastors lust after the “perfect” congregation and excuse their infidelity as kingdom work.  Peterson is extremely harsh at this point because he feels that a pastor is more like a farmer than a CEO.  However, our culture inundates us with “success” that drives us to not care for the land (congregation) but “rape it for profit.”  We view the congregation as a stepping stone rather than a place to put down roots and grow.

Peterson also believes that pastors are in danger of replacing God in their ministries.  They stand in such a position as to speak for God that at times the pastor does not deem it necessary to be connected to God.  It is prayer-less activity that is lacking “askesis.”  Pastors forego discipline, not simply of flesh beating, but the discipline that leads to humility.  It trades in reflection and contemplation which leaves us spiritually hollow.  This powerless spirituality may be disguised under dynamic personalities and winsome campaigns or programs, but it lacks Spirit and Word.  It is dead spirituality.  Peterson admonishes pastors that prayer must be an integral part of the ecclesial life for there to be any substance.

Being a pastor is not a matter of utilizing power to change people.  It’s not re-packaging the culture’s method of getting things done.  Rather, it is like Dostoevsky’s character, Prince Myshkin.  Myshkin is able to move about and relate with various people who all try to use him.  However, Myshkin is “unusable” and not much good for anything, “he is simply good.”  He’s not playing the game of power politics.  He doesn’t bow to the cultural trends.  Rather, he simply is.  I think Peterson is trying to communicate that “we” don’t change people, God does.  We are simply open to be there as the embodiment of God’s presence, expressions of God’s love.  We do not need to convict, motivate, move, or coerce people into a certain mold or path.  Instead, we live out our faith which marks us as totally different from those around us.  Ironically, this makes others attracted to us, like they were to Myshkin.  Being a pastor is not what you do, but who you are.

The vision of “vocational holiness” does not relish in the glamorous duties of the pastorate.  There are moments and places for these things; they are not bad in and of themselves.  But, they are not, according to Peterson, our primary moments of significance.  The “best sellers” come in the lists of our daily activities; the mundane, routine, run-of-the-mill, every day things we participate in.  There are God-moments and God-stories happening in the “lists” of those situations.  We are called to see the things God is doing in us and those around us in the everyday moments of life.

The problem for pastors and congregations is that they lack imagination.  They have facts and are fluent in those realities, but lack the competence of imagining the unseen.  That’s why we record numbers and stats.  We cannot see, nor work with those realities that are not before us.  As such, “unimportant” people and regular routines become boring and irritating.  We lack the vision to capture the beauty in those moments and people.  We are blinded by the present, ignorant of God’s work that He is preparing and accomplishing in us.  Thus, the luring call of Tarshish echoes in our ear.

By Peterson’s own admission, his pastoral identity is shaped in large part by his mother’s work as a pastor to the outcasts of society.  She ministered to the rough and tumble workers of the small, rural community.  She taught them and loved them with a great passion that Peterson has adopted.  His mother was later hindered from doing ministry by a “bully”, which he resented.  This deep passion to minister within one’s local context, putting down roots, and giving stability to a place is not only identified in Jonah but in his mom’s ministry.

The second person of great import was his first spiritual director, Reuben Lance.  Lance was an imposing man that seemed anything but fit to be a spiritual director.  However, after two failed attempts, one with his pastor and the other with a “spiritual” lay-person, Peterson found Lance to be liberating.  The man did not impose his own agenda on Peterson, nor did he conduct a glorified Bible study to impute his wisdom upon the young man.  Rather, Lance simply listened and talked about the regular things of life.  He gave Peterson space to be and to learn.  It was a safe place to question and to search, to learn and discover.  This time of spiritual direction shaped Peterson’s idea of vocational holiness in a profound way.

The idea of a spiritual director is a necessary one, Peterson asserts, until a fuller understanding of the biblical role of a pastor is recovered within our society.  However, Peterson also believes that spiritual director as a title is a bit of a misnomer.  It could lead one to possibly misunderstand its intended purpose.  Despite this reservation, he believes it is a distinction from the typical role of messiahs and managers, both of which are necessary parts of the pastoral calling but can be equally misconstrued by our ego.  The spiritual director is primarily a role of “unknowing” and “uncaring.”

Peterson writes, “All the same, difficult or not, there is a long-standing conviction in the Christian community that there are moments when unknowing takes precedence over knowing, and uncaring takes precedence over caring.  A common term to describe these moments is ‘spiritual direction’” (187).  Spiritual direction is given to those who are of a certain “level of maturity, both in intellect and in virtue.”  We do not undertake this with everyone.  It is not the opportunity to instruct others, but much more of a dynamic give-and-take relationship.  It is someone that becomes a “soul-friend.”  It is being “modest enough and wise enough simply to be companions… in the becoming and the entering in… Clearing the ground.  Removing obstructions.  Affirming the Real Presence.  Listening for the still small voice” (190).  It is entering a story, using words, not only to communicate, to commune with one another.

In reading Under the Unpredictable Plant, I found myself in hearty agreement with the author.  I believe the role of the pastor has become distorted by the various pressures of the culture.  There is an enormous push in the Church to “be successful”, which inevitably entails pastoring a large church, writing books, getting the “proper” education.  None of these things are bad in and of themselves; however, we often place those who achieve these standards on a higher pedestal than those who do not go the “prescribed” route.

I know I have fallen into the trap of Tarshish.  Out of a desire to do good and be a good steward (sin always distorts the good), I have often become prey to pride.  I did not enter ministry to become a CEO, but I can see where I have been pressed into that type of mold and model.  But, as I gain knowledge and “stature” among colleagues and the general church, I sense the ambition rise like a coiled snake ready to strike.  I glad-hand the right people, say the proper incantations of greeting, and pose like a show dog competing for the prize… although as I think on it, I’m not sure what prize that might be.

It is in those moments of ambition that I become disdainful of my congregation, self-sufficient (oxy-moronic), and defiant against God’s plan.  When Tarshish is my destination of choice there is little in the way of prayer, contemplation, and reflection.  I become angry and discontented with the menial, repugnant, typical, mundane, ordinary situations that I go through on a routine basis.  I have no sense of wonder at God’s mighty works displayed for all to see, either in myself or in the lives of those whom I am called to serve.  In all, I become very much like Jonah complaining under the withered leaves of the unpredictable plant.

The underlying thread of vocational holiness can be none other than love: love for God and love for my neighbor.  It means that I must be connected to the source that is my life and communing with those in my surrounding context.  My imagination must see, not what is, but the potential held within each person.  I am called to see with eyes of faith the wonderful ways that God is transforming the lives of those around me.  It is listening to the still, small voice.

Beyond that sentiment, as a spiritual director I am not always called to be “knowing” and “caring”, although that is an integral part of pastoral ministry.  Rather, I am called to be what I like to term “the power of Presence.”  In some mysterious way, pastors represent the tangible presence of God to others.  That does not mean that we have and hold all the answers or that we must “fix” all of the problems.  Rather, at times, it means we must do the exact opposite.  It means that we must be willing to do nothing.  Perhaps better worded, it means that we are to “be still and know that I AM God.”  We marvel at our smallness before the majesty of God’s power, love, and mercy.